Specific features of the state support mechanism for agriculture in Azerbaijan

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The article reveals the factors that determine the need for state support for agriculture and examines the features of the mechanism of this support in Azerbaijan. In particular, comparative advantages and disadvantages of subsidies based on land area and volume of production are scrutinized. The analysis shows that in recent years the share of state support in the gross agricultural product has been declining mainly due to the significant increase in prices for agricultural products. The author maintains that in order to increase the effectiveness of support for agriculture in Azerbaijan, it is necessary to take into account the specific characteristics of small farms and market factors.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Javad Gojamanov

Baku State University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: gojamanovjavid@gmail.com

Lecturer at the Department of Economics

Azerbaijão, Baku

Bibliografia

  1. Прохоренко П. Потенциал молочного скота // Животноводство Росии. 2005. № 1. С. 29–31.
  2. Указ Президента Азербайджанской Республики № 759 от 27.06.2019 г. «О создании нового механизма субсидирования в аграрном секторе».
  3. Указ Президента Азербайджанской Республики от 19.12.2018 г. № 413 «Об совершенствовании государственной поддержки сельского хозяйства и лизинговой деятельности в аграрном секторе».
  4. Agricultural Policies in OECD Countries. A posıtıve reform agenda OECD. Paris: OECD Publications, 2002, 41 p.
  5. Bieling C., Plieninger T. Recording manifestations of cultural ecosystem services in the landscape // Landscape Research. 2013. 38 (5). P. 649–667.
  6. Cerroni S. Eliciting farmers’ subjective probabilities, risk, and uncertainty preferences using contextualized field experiments // Agricultural Economics. 2020. 51. P. 707–724.
  7. Erjavec E., Lovec M. Research of European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy: disciplinary boundaries and beyond // European Review of Agricultural Economics. 2017. 44. P. 732–754.
  8. Finger R., El Benni N. Farm income in European agriculture: new perspectives on measurement and implications for policy evaluation // European Review of Agricultural Economics. 2021. 8 (2). P. 253–265.
  9. Fitton N., Alexander P., Arnell N., Bajzelj B., Calvin K., Doelman J., Gerber J.S., Havlik P., Hasegawa T., et al. The vulnerabilities of agricultural land and food production to future water scarcity // Global Environmental Change. 2019. 58. 101944.
  10. Helfand S.M., Taylor M.P. The inverse relationship between farm size and productivity: Refocusing the debate // 2017 Pacific Conference for Development Economics Riverside. Cali- fornia. 2017.
  11. Huang, Z., Du, X., Castillo, C.S.Z. How does urbanization affect farmland protection? // Evidence from China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2019. 145. P. 139–147.
  12. Iyer P., Bozzola M., Hirsch S., Meraner M., Finger R. Measuring farmer risk preferences in Europe: a systematic review // Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2020. 71. P. 3–26.
  13. Larson D., Matsumoto T., KilicT., Otsuka K. Should African rural development strategies depend on smallholder farms? An exploration of the inverse‐productivity hypothesis // Agricultural Economics 2014. 45(3). P. 55–67.
  14. Matthews A. Greening agricultural payments in the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy // Bio-based and Applied Economics. 2013. 2. P. 1–27.
  15. OECD´s Producer Support Estimated and related indicators of agricultural support. Concepts, Calculations, Interpretation and Use (The PSE Manual). Paris: OECD Publications. 2016. 194 p.
  16. Otsuka K., Liu Y, Yamauchi F. The future of small farms in Asia // Development Policy Review. 2016. 34(3). P. 441–461.
  17. Swinton S.M., Lupi F., Robertson G.P., Hamilton, S.K. Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecological Economics. 2007. 64. P. 245–252.
  18. URL: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RL
  19. URL: https://www.maliyye.gov.az
  20. URL: https://www.stat.gov.az
  21. URL: https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/ag_e.htm

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar
2. Fig. 1. Annual precipitation and average annual temperature in Azerbaijan

Baixar (829KB)
Metadados

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025