Solid products of n2o5 uptake on a methane flame soot

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Modern global models used for long-term prediction of the chemical composition of the Earth’s atmosphere require detailed information on the rate constants of numerous elementary chemical reactions. In addition, data on the composition of the reaction products is also of great importance. In this work, high-resolution mass spectrometry was used to identify the solid products of soot nitration by dinitrogen pentoxide (N2O5) during methane combustion. A high reactivity of N2O5 toward polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (CnHm class) present in the initial soot was established. It was shown that the solid nitration products include nitro derivatives of polycyclic aromatic compounds, aromatic acids, and their esters. In terms of composition and compound classes, the products of soot nitration by N2O5 are similar to those obtained in nitration by nitrogen dioxide (NO2).

Авторлар туралы

I. Sulimenkov

Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Moscow, Russia

V. Filatov

Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Moscow, Russia

V. Brusov

Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Moscow, Russia

E. Aparina

Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Moscow, Russia

V. Zelenov

Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: v.zelenov48@gmail.com
Moscow, Russia

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Stone D., Evans M.J., Walker H. et al. // Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014. V. 14. № 3. P. 1299. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1299-2014
  2. Wild R.J., Edwards P.M., Bates T.S. et al. // Ibid. 2016. V. 16. № 2. P. 573. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-573-2016
  3. Wagner N.L., Dubé W.P., Washenfelder R.A. et al. // Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2011. V. 4. № 6. P. 1227. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1227-2011
  4. Ларин И.К., Алоян А.Е., Ермаков А.Н. // Хим. физика. 2021. Т. 40. № 5. С. 86. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X21050095
  5. Brown S.S., Stutz J. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012. V. 41. № 19. P. 6405. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35181a
  6. Chang W.L., Bhave P.V., Brown S.S. et al. // Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2011. V. 45. № 6. P. 665. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.551672
  7. Zhou W., Zhao J., Ouyang B. et al. // Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2018. V. 18. № 16. P. 11581. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11581-2018
  8. Wagner N.L., Riedel T.P., Young C.J. et al. // J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2013. V. 118. № 16. P. 9331. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50653
  9. Berner A., Sidla S., Galambos Z. et al. // Ibid. 1996. V. 101. № D14. P. 19559. https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD03425
  10. Pohl K., Cantwell M., Herckes P., Lohmann R. // Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014. V. 14. № 14. P. 7431. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7431-2014
  11. Bond T.C., Streets D.G., Yarber K.F. et al. // J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2004. V. 109. № D14. P. 14203. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003697
  12. Wang R., Tao S., Shen H. et al. // Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014. V. 48. № 12. P. 6780. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5021422
  13. Klimont Z., Kupiainen K., Heyes C. et al. // Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017. V. 17. № 14. P. 8681. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8681-2017
  14. Brouwer L., Rossi M.J., Golden D.M. // J. Phys. Chem. 1986. V. 90. № 19. P. 4599. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100410a025
  15. Longfellow C.A., Ravishankara A.R., Hanson D.R. // J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2000. V. 105. № D19. P. 24345. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900297
  16. Saathoff H., Naumann K.-H., Riemer N. et al. // Geophys. Res. Lett. 2001. V. 28. № 10. P. 1957. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012619
  17. Karagulian F., Rossi M.J. // J. Phys. Chem. A. 2007. V. 111. № 10. P. 1914. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0670891
  18. Зеленов В.В., Апарина Е.В., Каштанов С.А., Шардакова Э.В. // Хим. физика. 2016. Т. 35. № 4. С. 78. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0207401X16040129
  19. Зеленов В.В., Апарина Е.В. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 12. С. 81. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22120111
  20. Травин С.О., Громов О.Б., Утробин Д.В., Рощин А.В. // Хим. физика. 2019. Т. 38. № 11. С. 5. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0207401X19110116
  21. Зеленов В.В., Апарина Е.В., Каштанов С.А., Шардакова Э.В. // Хим. физика. 2015. Т. 34. № 3. С. 87. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0207401X15030140
  22. Sander S.P., Abbatt J.P.D., Barker J.R. et al. Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies. NASA JPL Publication 10-6. № 17. Pasadena: JPL, 2011. http://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov
  23. Akhter M.S., Chughtai A.R., Smith D.M. // Appl. Spectrosc. 1985. V. 39. № 1. P. 143. https://doi.org/10.1366/0003702854249114
  24. Siegmann K., Hepp H., Sattler K. // Combust. Sci. Technol. 1995. V. 109. № 1–6. P. 165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102209508951900
  25. Stadler D., Rossi M.J. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2000. V. 2. № 23. P. 5420. https://doi/org/10.1039/b005680o
  26. Onischuk A.A., di Stasio S., Karasev V.V. et al. // J. Aerosol Sci. 2003. V. 34. № 4. P. 383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(02)00215-X
  27. Cain J.P., Gassman P.L., Wang H., Laskin A. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010. V. 12. № 20. P. 5206. https://doi.org/10.1039/b924344e
  28. Roy R., Jan R., Gunjal G. et al. // Atmos. Environ. 2019. V. 210. P. 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.04.034
  29. Öktem B., Tolocka M.P., Zhao B. et al. // Combust. and Flame. 2005. V. 142. № 4. P. 364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.03.016
  30. Liu Y., Liu C., Ma J. et al. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010. V. 12. № 36. P. 10896. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp00402b
  31. Burkholder J.B., Sander S.P., Abbatt J.P.D. et al. Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies. NASA JPL Publication 19–5. № 19. Pasadena: JPL, 2019. http://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov
  32. Akhter M.S., Chughtai A.R., Smith D.M. // J. Phys. Chem. 1984. V. 88. № 22. P. 5334. https://doi.org/10.1021/j150666a046
  33. Smith D.M., Chughtai A.R. // J. Geophys. Res. 1996. V. 101. № D14. P. 19607. https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD03032
  34. Kirchner U., Scheer V., Vogt R. // J. Phys. Chem. A. 2000. V. 104. № 39. P. 8908. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0005322
  35. Han C., Liu Y., He H. // Atmos. Environ. 2013. V. 64. № 2. P. 270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.008
  36. Зеленов В.В., Апарина Е.В., Козловский В.И. и др. // Хим. физика. 2019. Т. 38. № 1. С. 86. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0207401X19010163
  37. Еганов А.А., Кардонский Д.А., Сулименков И.В. и др. // Хим. физика. 2023. Т. 42. № 4. С. 81. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23040064
  38. Зеленов В.В., Апарина Е.В. // Хим. физика. 2023. Т. 42. № 1. С. 73. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23010144
  39. Kozlovski V, Brusov V., Sulimenkov I. et al. // Rapid Commun. MassSpectrom. 2004. V. 18. № 7. P. 780. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1405
  40. www.sisweb.com/software/ms/nist.htm
  41. Разников В.В., Разникова М.О., Пихтелев А.Р. и др. // Хим. физика. 2025. Т. 44. № 9. С. 3.
  42. Разников В.В., Разникова М.О., Чудинов А.В. и др. // Хим. физика. 2025. Т. 44. № 9. С. 22.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025