Effect of Different Classes of Proteases on Techno-functional Properties of Pea Protein Isolates

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The effect of four enzyme preparations: bacillolysin, agroprot, protozyme and protozyme C (Russia) on solubility, emulsifying activity, emulsion stability, foaming and foam stability of isolates preparated from two varieties of peas was studied. It is shown that treatment with enzymes can increase the solubility of isolates at pH 5 by more than 7 times, the index of emulsifying activity at pH 5 by 1.5 to 2 times, and at pH 6 by almost 1.5 times; the stability index of the emulsion increased by about 20% at pH 5, and by 1.7 times (in one of the varieties) at pH 6; foaming increased by 2.4 to 3 times at pH 5, and at pH 6 by 1.8 to 3.7 times; foam stability increased by 25 to 33% at pH 5 and by more than 1.5 times (in one of the varieties) at pH 6. The results obtained made it possible to select an enzyme preparation (bacterial alkaline serine protease) to improve the parameters of pea protein isolates intended for the manufacture of analogues of fermented milk products.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

I. Kravchenko

Research Center of Biotechnology of the RAS

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: ink71@yandex.ru

Bach Institute of Biochemistry

Ресей, Moscow, 119071

V. Furalyov

Research Center of Biotechnology of the RAS

Email: ink71@yandex.ru

Bach Institute of Biochemistry

Ресей, Moscow, 119071

E. Kostyleva

All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Food Biotechnology — a Branch of the Federal Research Center for Nutrition, Biotechnology and Food Safety

Email: ink71@yandex.ru
Ресей, Moscow, 111033

A. Sereda

All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Food Biotechnology — a Branch of the Federal Research Center for Nutrition, Biotechnology and Food Safety

Email: ink71@yandex.ru
Ресей, Moscow, 111033

E. Kurbatova

All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Food Biotechnology — a Branch of the Federal Research Center for Nutrition, Biotechnology and Food Safety

Email: ink71@yandex.ru
Ресей, Moscow, 111033

N. Tsurikova

All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Food Biotechnology — a Branch of the Federal Research Center for Nutrition, Biotechnology and Food Safety

Email: ink71@yandex.ru
Ресей, Moscow, 111033

E. Pshennikova

Research Center of Biotechnology of the RAS

Email: ink71@yandex.ru

Bach Institute of Biochemistry

Ресей, Moscow, 119071

T. Boyarintseva

Research Center of Biotechnology of the RAS

Email: ink71@yandex.ru

Bach Institute of Biochemistry

Ресей, Moscow, 119071

V. Popov

Research Center of Biotechnology of the RAS

Email: ink71@yandex.ru

Bach Institute of Biochemistry

Ресей, Moscow, 119071

A. Fedorov

Research Center of Biotechnology of the RAS

Email: ink71@yandex.ru

Bach Institute of Biochemistry

Ресей, Moscow, 119071

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Tesarowicz I., Zawiślak A., Maciejaszek I., Surówka K. // International J. Food Sciences. 2022. V. 2022. P. 6187441. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6187441
  2. Schlegel K., Sontheimer K., Eisner P., Schweiggert-Weisz U. // Food Science & Nutrition. 2019. V. 8. P. 3041–3051. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1286
  3. Meinlschmidt P., Schweiggert-Weisz U., Brode V., Eisner P. // LWT — Food Science & Technology. 2016. V. 68. P. 707–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.01.023
  4. Yust M. M., Pedroche J., Millán-Linares M. C., Alcaide-Hidalgo J.M., Millán F. // Food Chemistry. 2010. V. 122. № 4. P. 1212–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.11.053
  5. Yust M. M., Millán-Linares M. D. C., Alcaide-Hidalgo J. M., Millán F., Pedroche J. // Food Science & Technology International. 2013. V. 19. P. 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013212442197
  6. Paraman I., Hettiarachchy N. S., Schaefer C., Beck M. I. // Cereal Chemistry. 2007. V. 84. P. 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-84-4-0343
  7. Neves V. A., Lourenço E. J., da Silva M. A. // Arch. Latinoam. Nutr. 1996. V. 46. № 3. P. 238–242.
  8. Higgins T. J., Chandler P. M., Randall P. J., Spencer D., Beach L. R., Blagrove R. J., Kortt A. A., Inglis A. S. // J. Biol. Chem. 1986. V. 261. P. 11124–11130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)67357-0
  9. Stone A. K., Karalash A., Tyler R. T., Warkentin T. D., Nickerson N. T. // Food Research International. 2015. V. 76. P. 31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.11.017
  10. Asen N. D., Aluko R. E. // Front Nutr. 2022. V. 9. P. 852225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.852225
  11. Ivanova P., Kalaydzhiev H., Dessev T. T., Silva C. L. M., Rustad T., Chalova V. I. J. // Food Sci. Technol. 2018. V. 55. № 9. P. 3792–3798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3311-y
  12. Nielsen P. M., Petersen D., Dambmann C. // J. Food Sci. 2001. V. 66. № 5. P. 642–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb04614.x
  13. Adler-Nissen J. Enzymic Hydrolysis of Food Proteins. // New York: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, 1986. 427 р.
  14. Matoba T. // Agric Biol Ghem. 1972. V. 36. P. 1423–1443. https://doi.org/10.1080/00021369.1972.10860410
  15. Barac M., Cabrilo S., Pesiesic M., Stanojevic S., Zilic S., Macej O., Ristic N. // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010. V. 1. P. 4973–4990. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms11124973
  16. Robinson G. H.; Domoney C. // Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021. V. 158. P. 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.11.020
  17. Klost M., Drusch S. // Food Hydrocoll. 2019. V. 86. P. 134–140. https://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-9553

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. Laemmli electrophoresis of protein isolates obtained from pea varieties Rodnik (a, c, d, g) and Fokor (b, d, f, h) and treated with 8.9 units/ml BNP (a, b), 1.5 units/ml GKP (c, d), 1.5 units/ml GSP (d, f) and 1.5 units/ml BSCP (g, h): 1 — untreated isolate, 2 — 15 min, 3 — 30 min, 4 — 1 h, 5 — 2 h of treatment; M — molecular weight markers.

Жүктеу (258KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 2. Effect of treatment with BNP, GKP, GSHP and BSCHP on the solubility of pea protein isolates of the Rodnik (a, c) and Fokor (b, d) varieties at pH 5.0 (a, b) and 6 (c, d) and different treatment times: 1 - no treatment, 2 - 15 min; 3 - 30 min; 4 - 1 h; 5 - 2 h.

Жүктеу (735KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 3. Effect of treatment with BNP, GKP, GSHP and BSCHP on the emulsifying activity index of pea protein isolates of the Rodnik (a, c) and Fokor (b, d) varieties at pH 5.0 (a, b) and 6.0 (c, d) with different treatment times: 1 - no treatment, 2 - 15 min; 3 - 30 min; 4 - 1 h; 5 - 2 h.

Жүктеу (678KB)
Метадеректер
5. Fig. 4. Effect of BNP, GKP, GSHP and BSCP treatment on the emulsion stability index of pea protein isolates of the Rodnik (a, c) and Fokor (b, d) varieties at pH 5 (a, b) and 6 (c, d) with different treatment times: 1 — no treatment, 2 — 15 min; 3 — 30 min; 4 — 1 h; 5 — 2 h.

Жүктеу (670KB)
Метадеректер
6. Fig. 5. Effect of BNP, GKP, GSHP and BSCP treatment on foaming of pea protein isolates of the Rodnik (a, c) and Fokor (b, d) varieties at pH 5 (a, b) and 6 (c, d) with different treatment times: 1 — no treatment; 2 — 15 min; 3 — 30 min; 4 — 1 h; 5 — 2 h.

Жүктеу (678KB)
Метадеректер
7. Fig. 6. Effect of treatment with BNP, GKP, GSHP and BSHP on the foam stability of pea protein isolates of the Rodnik (a, c) and Fokor (b, d) varieties at pH 5.0 (a, b) and 6 (c, d) for different treatment times: 1 - no treatment, 2 - 15 min; 3 - 30 min; 4 - 1 h; 5 - 2 h.

Жүктеу (830KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024