Composite cation exchange membrane based оn а polyvinyldene fluoride substrate filled with perfluorinated sulfopolymer

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

The composite cation-exchange membrane is fabricated by impregnating an inert isotropic substrate with a three-dimensional network of nanofibers made of a perfluorinated sulfonated polymer. The membrane's surface morphology and structure are analyzed using scanning electron microscopy. The thickness, exchange capacity, moisture content, volume fractions of the gel phase, concentration dependences of the specific electrical conductivity, diffusion permeability and counterion transport numbers of the membranes are determined in NaCl solutions. These characteristics are compared with those of the commercial reinforced membrane Nafion® N438. The developed membrane exhibits higher selectivity and lower electrical resistance than the commercial benchmark while requiring less perfluorinated sulfonated polymer for production. The combination of these factors indicates the prospects of the developed domestic membrane and its potential competitiveness.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

M. Ponomar

Kuban State University

Email: vsarapulova@gmail.com
Rússia, Krasnodar, 350040

M. Porozhnyy

Kuban State University

Email: vsarapulova@gmail.com
Rússia, Krasnodar, 350040

V. Sarapulova

Kuban State University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: vsarapulova@gmail.com
Rússia, Krasnodar, 350040

E. Korzhova

Krasnodar Compressor Plant LLC

Email: vsarapulova@gmail.com
Rússia, Krasnodar region, Dinskaya, 353204

D. Lopatin

Krasnodar Compressor Plant LLC

Email: vsarapulova@gmail.com
Rússia, Krasnodar region, Dinskaya, 353204

I. Voroshilov

Krasnodar Compressor Plant LLC

Email: vsarapulova@gmail.com
Rússia, Krasnodar region, Dinskaya, 353204

Bibliografia

  1. Filippov S.P., Yaroslavtsev A.B. // Russ. Chem. Rev. 2021. V. 90. № 6. P. 627–643.
  2. Sengupta S., Lyulin A.V. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2019. V. 123. № 31. P. 6882–6891.
  3. Cognard G., Ozouf G., Beauger C., Dubau L., López-Haro M., Chatenet M., Maillard F. // Electrochim. Acta. 2017. V. 245. P. 993–1004.
  4. Yampolskii Y.P., Belov N.A., Alentiev A.Y. // Russ. Chem. Rev. 2019. V. 88. № 4. P. 387–405.
  5. Stenina I.A., Yaroslavtsev A.B. // Pure Appl. Chem. 2017. V. 89. № 8. P. 1185–1194.
  6. Vinothkannan M., Son B., Shanmugam S. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2022. V. 10. № 16. P. 8975–8988.
  7. Baker A.M., Wang L., Johnson W.B., Prasad A.K., Advani S.G. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2014. V. 118. № 46. P. 26796–26802.
  8. Vinothkannan M., Kim A.R., Ryu S.K., Yoo D.J. // J. Memb. Sci. 2022. V. 649. P. 120393.
  9. Vinothkannan M., Kim A.R., Ramakrishnan S., Yu Y.-T., Yoo D.J. // Compos. Part B Eng. 2021. V. 215. P. 108828.
  10. Grot W. Fluorinated Ionomers. Waltham: Elsevier Inc., 2011. 312 p.
  11. Liu Y., Nguyen T., Kristian N., Yu Y., Wang X. // J. Memb. Sci. 2009. V. 330. № 1–2. P. 357–362.
  12. Wu B., Zhao M., Shi W., Liu W., Liu J., Xing D., Yao Y., Hou Z., Ming P., Gu J., Zou Z. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2014. V. 39. № 26. P. 14381–14390.
  13. Kusoglu A., Weber A.Z. // Chem. Rev. 2017. V. 117. № 3. P. 987–1104.
  14. Shi S., Weber A.Z., Kusoglu A. // J. Memb. Sci. 2016. V. 516. P. 123–134.
  15. Mukundan R., Baker A.M., Kusoglu A., Beattie P., Knights S., Weber A.Z., Borup R.L. // J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018. V. 165. № 6. P. F3085–F3093.
  16. Robert M., El Kaddouri A., Perrin J.-C., Leclerc S., Lottin O. // J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018. V. 165. № 6. P. F3209–F3216.
  17. Zhang X., Trieu D., Zheng D., Ji W., Qu H., Ding T., Qiu D., Qu D. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021. V. 60. № 30. P. 11086–11094.
  18. Lin Q., Sun X., Chen X., Shi S. // Fuel Cells. 2019. V. 19. № 5. P. 530–538.
  19. Zhang H., Shen P.K. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012. V. 41. № 6. P. 2382.
  20. Dorenbos G., Morohoshi K. // Energy Environ. Sci. 2010. V. 3. № 9. P. 1326.
  21. Yildirim M.H., Stamatialis D., Wessling M. // J. Memb. Sci. 2008. V. 321. № 2. P. 364–372.
  22. Jagur‐Grodzinski J. // Polym. Adv. Technol. 2007. V. 18. № 10. P. 785–799.
  23. Ji Y.-L., Lu H.-H., Gu B.-X., Ye R.-F., Zhou Y., An Q.-F., Gao C.-J. // Chem. Eng. J. 2021. V. 416. P. 129080.
  24. Mollá S., Compañ V., Gimenez E., Blazquez A., Urdanpilleta I. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2011. V. 36. № 16. P. 9886–9895.
  25. Saleem J., Gao P., Barford J., McKay G. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2013. V. 1. № 45. P. 14335.
  26. Zhang C., Yue X., Luan J., Lu N., Mu Y., Zhang S., Wang G. // ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020. V. 3. № 7. P. 7180–7190.
  27. Hu H., Ding F., Ding H., Liu J., Xiao M., Meng Y., Sun L. // Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2020. V. 3. № 4. P. 498–507.
  28. Cha J.-E., Cho W.J., Hwang J., Seo D.-J., Choi Y.-W., Kim W.B. // Sci. Rep. 2022. V. 12. № 1. P. 14001.
  29. Miyake J., Watanabe T., Shintani H., Sugawara Y., Uchida M., Miyatake K. // ACS Mater. Au. 2021. V. 1. № 1. P. 81–88.
  30. Коржова Е.С., Лопатин Д.С., Баранов О.А., Ворошилов И.В. Пат. 231738 Протонообменная полимерная мембрана. Россия, 2024.
  31. Yesaswi C.S., Sreekanth P.S.R. // Mater. Today Proc. 2020. V. 27. P. 936–939.
  32. Березина Н.П., Тимофеев С.В., Ролле А.Л., Федорович Н.В., Дюран-Видаль С. // Электрохимия. 2002. Т. 38. № 8. С. 1009–1015.
  33. Gloukhovski R., Tsur Y., Freger V. // Fuel Cells. 2017. V. 17. № 1. P. 56–66.
  34. Berezina N.P., Kononenko N.A., Dyomina O.A., Gnusin N.P. // Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008. V. 139. № 1–2. P. 3–28.
  35. Карпенко Л.В., Демина О.А., Дворкина Г.А., Паршиков С.Б., Ларше К., Оклер Б., Березина Н.П. // Электрохимия. 2001. Т. 37. № 3. С. 328–335.
  36. Pismenskaya N.D., Nevakshenova E.E., Nikonenko V. V. // Pet. Chem. 2018. V. 58. № 6. P. 465–473.
  37. Zabolotsky V.I., Nikonenko V.V. // J. Memb. Sci. 1993. V. 79. № 2–3. P. 181–198.
  38. Sarapulova V., Shkorkina I., Mareev S., Pismenskaya D., Kononenko N., Larchet C., Dammak L., Nikonenko V. // Membranes (Basel). 2019. V. 9. № 7. P. 84.
  39. Sarapulova V.V., Titorova V.D., Nikonenko V.V., Pismenskaya N.D. // Membr. Membr. Technol. 2019. V. 1. № 3. P. 168–182.
  40. Butylskii D., Moroz I., Tsygurina K., Mareev S. // Membranes (Basel). 2020. V. 10. № 3. P. 40.
  41. Sarapulova V., Pismenskaya N., Butylskii D., Titorova V., Wang Y., Xu T., Zhang Y., Nikonenko V. // Membranes (Basel). 2020. V. 10. № 8. P. 165.
  42. Larchet C., Auclair B., Nikonenko V. // Electrochim. Acta. 2004. V. 49. № 11. P. 1711–1717.
  43. Stenina I., Golubenko D., Nikonenko V., Yaroslavtsev A. // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020. V. 21. № 15. P. 5517.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar
2. Fig. 1. Images of the surfaces and cross-section of the membranes M1 (a, b) and N438 (c, d), obtained by optical microscopy (a, c) and using a scanning electron microscope (b, d). The inset to Fig. b shows an image of the PVDF substrate.

Baixar (470KB)
Metadados
3. Fig. 2. Concentration dependences of surface resistance Rm (a) and diffusion flow of electrolyte Js (b) of membranes M1 and Nafion® N438.

Baixar (139KB)
Metadados
4. Fig. 3. Concentration dependences of specific electrical conductivity (a) and integral coefficient of diffusion permeability (b) of membranes M1 and Nafion® N438.

Baixar (136KB)
Metadados
5. Fig. 4. Concentration dependences of counterion transport numbers for the M1 membrane and the Nafion® N438 membrane.

Baixar (84KB)
Metadados

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025