Glow discharge treatment of nitrocellulose membranes increases the immunoassay sensitivity

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Plasma treatment can make the surfaces of the materials more hydrophilic and improve the surface and adsorption properties. Our research shows that the glow discharge treatment of nitrocellulose membranes improves the adsorption capacity for antibodies by a factor of 15-17 and increases the sensitivity of immunoassay (dot-blotting) performed on the membranes approximatively by an order of magnitude. This feature has been demonstrated for the interleukin-1 beta immunoassay with chemiluminescent detection. Upon glow discharge treatment, the nitrocellulose membranes did not change their structure or chemical composition as can be seen using scanning electron microscopy and IR spectroscopy, respectively. The obtained results can be used to optimize the existing laboratory procedures, especially dot-blotting.

Sobre autores

P. Petrova

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Moscow, Russia

S. Zamalutdinova

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Moscow, Russia

A. Vnukova

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Moscow, Russia

D. Alekseeva

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Moscow, Russia

D. Bagrov

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: bagrov@mail.bio.msu.ru
Moscow, Russia

Bibliografia

  1. R. Hawkes, E. Niday, and J. Gordon, Anal. Biochem., 119 (1), 142 (1982).
  2. D. I. Stott, J. Immunoassay, 21 (2-3), 273 (2000).
  3. V. Faoro and G. Stanta, In Guidelines for Molecular Analysis in Archive Tissues, Ed. by G. Stanta (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011), pp. 275-276.
  4. S. Zhang, et al., Analyst, 139 (2), 439 (2014).
  5. N. Tsurusawa, J. Chang, M. Namba, et al., J. Clin. Med., 10 (21), 5197 (2021).
  6. S. Watabe, H. Kodama, M. Kaneda, et al., Biophysics (Japan), 10, 49 (2014).
  7. J. Wang, et al., PLoS One, 8 (12). e82888 (2013).
  8. C. F. O. Hoy, et al., Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research, 26, 100304 (2019).
  9. N. Kaneko, et al., Inflamm. Regener., 39 (1). 12 (2019).
  10. C. A. Schneider, W. S. Rasband, and K. W. Eliceiri, Nat. Methods, 9 (7), 671 (2012).
  11. A. Li, et al., Cytotechnology, 65 (1), 71 (2013).
  12. T. H. Meltzer and M. Jornitz, Am. Pharmaceut. Rev., 6, 44 (2003).
  13. Z. Ashrafi, L. Lucia, and W. Krause, Soft Matter, 15 (45), 9359 (2019).
  14. I. Nikishin, et al., Micron, 145, 103044 (2021).
  15. D. V. Bagrov, et al. Microscopy Res. & Technique, 85 (2), 562 (2022).
  16. O. I. Volokh, et al., Front. Mol. Biosci., 9, 1048117 (2022).
  17. J. G. Dillard and I. M. Spinu, J. Adhesion, 31 (2-4), 137 (1990).
  18. P.-O. Bussiere, J.-L. Gardette, and S. Therias, Polymer Degradation and Stability, 107, 246 (2014).
  19. V. I. Kovalenko, et al., J. Struct. Chem., 34 (4), 540 (1994).
  20. А. М. Сенковенко и др., Биофизика, 67 (3), 555 (2022).
  21. О. Йосихито, Высокомолекуляр. соединения, 30 (9), 1815 (1988).
  22. T. Desmet, et al., Biomacromolecules, 10 (9), 2351 (2009).

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023