The Effect of Moisture on the Characteristics of Co-Incineration of Pulp and Paper Sludge and Municipal Waste

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The combustion behavior of a wet mixture of sludge from a pulp and paper plant and municipal waste is analyzed through complementary experiments. The collected mixed sludge was first naturally dried to decrease its initial moisture percentage to 5–9%. Pure water with mass proportions between 30 and 60% was added to the naturally dried samples to analyze their combustion behavior. Thermogravimetric experiments were carried out on the dried and humidified samples under air and applying heating rates between 5 and 100°C/min. The thermogravimetric profiles and the heat flows of the dried and humidified samples were compared. The CO, CO2, and total hydrocarbons emissions were measured during further combustion experiments carried out under isothermal temperatures of 600, 700, 800, or 900°C.

About the authors

P. A. Maryandyshev

Northern (Arctic) Federal University

Email: p.marjyandishev@narfu.ru
163000 Arkhangelsk, Russia

A. Brillard

Universite de Haute-Alsace

Email: alain.brillard@uha.fr
68100 Mulhouse, France

A. P. Terekhin

Northern (Arctic) Federal University

Email: trhnlx@yandex.ru
163000 Arkhangelsk, Russia

References

  1. Gavrilescu D. // Environmental Engineering and Management Journal. 2008. V. 7. P. 537. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2008.077
  2. Bajpai P. Pretreatment of Sludge. In: Management of Pulp and Paper Mill Waste. Springer International Publishing, Cham. 2015. P. 31.
  3. Huilinnir C., Villegas M. // Bioresource Technology. 2014. V. 157. P. 206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.109
  4. Zawieja I. // Desalination and Water Treatment 2023. V. 301. P. 277. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2023.29790
  5. Hu J., Shen Y., Zhu N. // Waste Management. 2023. V. 169. P. 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.06.033
  6. Yaras A., Demirel B., Akkurt F., Arslanoglu H. // Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 2021. V. 13. P. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01232-9
  7. Yu Y.H., Kim S.D., Lee J.M., Lee K.H. // Energy. 2002. V. 27. P. 457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(01)00097-4
  8. Chiang K.-Y., Lu C.-H., Liao C.-K., Hsien-Ruen Ger R. // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2016. V. 41. P. 21641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.199
  9. Coimbra R.N., Paniagua S., Escapa C., Calvo L.F., Otero M. // Renewable Energy. 2015. V. 83. P. 1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.05.046
  10. Yin Y., Yin H., Yuan Z., Wu Z., Zhang W., Tian H., Feng L., Cheng S., Qing M., Song Q. // BioEnergy Research. 2021. V. 14. P. 1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-021-10248-6
  11. Lin Y., Ma X., Peng X., Yu Z., Fang S., Lin Y., Fan Y. // Fuel. 2016. V. 181. P. 905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.031
  12. Shao J., Yuan X., Leng L., Huang H., Jiang L., Wang H., Chen X., Zeng G. // Bioresource Technology. 2015. V. 198. P. 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.147
  13. Kangash A., Kehrli D., Brillard A., Maryandyshev P., Trouve G., Lyubov V., Brilhac J.-F. // Fuel. 2022. V. 316. P. 123343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123343
  14. Ling W., Xing Y., Hong C., Zhang B., Hu J., Zhao C., Wang Y., Feng L. // Science of The Total Environment. 2022. V. 845. P. 157376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157376
  15. Gong K., Li X., Liu H., Cheng X., Sun D., Shao Q., Dong M., Liu C., Wu S., Ding T., Qiu B., Guo Z. // Carbon. 2020. V. 156. P. 320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.09.046

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences