Determination Of Optimal Conditions For Template Sol-Gel Synthesis For The Formation Of Antibacterial Materials

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

One of the current global problems is the increasing resistance of microorganisms to antibacterial agents and the emergence of associated infections. Therefore, the synthesis of new hybrid materials capable of resisting bacteria is necessary. In this work, loading platforms for antibacterial material based on tetraethoxysilane were formed using yeast cells Ogataea polymorpha BKM Y-2559 and Cryptococcus curvatus VKM Y-3288 as templates under conditions of acid and alkaline hydrolysis. Using scanning electron microscopy, it was shown that an alkaline environment is most optimal when using yeast cells as templates for the formation of a porous material. The surface-active properties of a number of quaternary ammonium compounds were studied using the tensometry method to select the optimal template for the production of antibacterial materials in one stage.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

E. A. Lantsova

Tula State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: e.a.lantsova@tsu.tula.ru
Russian Federation, Tula, 300012

M. A. Bardina

Tula State University

Email: e.a.lantsova@tsu.tula.ru
Russian Federation, Tula, 300012

E. A. Saverina

Tula State University

Email: e.a.lantsova@tsu.tula.ru
Russian Federation, Tula, 300012

O. A. Kamanina

Tula State University

Email: e.a.lantsova@tsu.tula.ru
Russian Federation, Tula, 300012

References

  1. Cámara M., Green W., MacPhee C. et al. // Biofilms Microbiomes. 2022. V. 8. № 1. P. 42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-022-00306-y
  2. Nadeem S., Gohar U., Tahir S. et al. // Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2020. V. 46. № 5. P. 578. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040841X.2020.1813687
  3. Murray C.J.L., Ikuta K.S., Sharara F. et al. // Lancet. 2022. V. 399. № 10325. P. 629. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0
  4. Saverina E.A., Frolov N.A., Kamanina O.A. et al. // ACS Infect. Dis. 2023. V. 9. № 3. P. 394. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.2c00469
  5. Nielsen J.E., Alford M.A., Yung D.B.Y. et al. // ACS Infect. Dis. 2022. V. 8. № 3. P. 533. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00536
  6. Song B., Zhang E., Han X. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020. V. 12. № 19. P. 21330. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b19992
  7. Spirescu V.A., Chircov C., Grumezescu A.M. et al. // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021. V. 22. № 9. P. 4595. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094595
  8. Zhang T., Jin Z., Jia Z. et al. // React. Funct. Polym. 2022. V. 170. P. 105117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2021.105117
  9. Ma B., Chen Y., Hu G. et al. // ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2022. V. 8. № 1. P. 109. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01267
  10. Alekseeva O.V., Smirnova D.N., Noskov A.V. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2023. V. 68. № 8. P. 953. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023623601071
  11. Wen M., Fu X., Li T. et al. // Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2023. V. 93. № 9. P. 2371. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363223090189
  12. Diaz D., Church J., Young M. et al. // J. Environ. Sci. 2019. V. 82. P. 213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2019.03.011
  13. Zhang H., Liu L., Hou P. et al. // Polymers. 2022. V. 14. № 9. P. 1737. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14091737
  14. Feng X.Z., Xiao Z., Zhang L. et al. // Nat. Prod. Commun. 2020. V. 15. № 8. P. 1934578X20948365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X20948365
  15. Garipov M.R., Sabirova A.E., Pavelyev R.S. et al. // Bioorg. Chem. 2020. V. 104. P. 104306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104306
  16. Sokolova A.S., Yarovaya O.I., Baranova D.V. et al. // Arch. Virol. 2021. V. 166. № 7. P. 1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-021-05102-1
  17. Gaspar C., Rolo J., Cerca N. et al. // Pathogens. 2021. V. 10. № 3. P. 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10030261
  18. Bueno V., Ghoshal S. // Langmuir. 2020. V. 36. № 48. P. 14633. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02501
  19. Zaharudin N.S., Isa E.D.M., Ahmad H. et al. // J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2020. V. 24. № 3. P. 289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2020.01.003
  20. Stewart C.A., Finer Y., Hatton B.D. // Sci. Rep. 2018. V. 8. № 1. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19166-8
  21. Hoa B.T., Phuc L.H., Hien N.Q. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 1. P. 63. https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602362260160X
  22. Kamanina O.A., Saverina E.A., Rybochkin P.V. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2022. V. 12. № 7. P. 1086. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12071086
  23. Dolinina E.S., Parfenyuk E.V. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 3. P. 401. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622030068
  24. Voronova M.I., Surov O.V., Rubleva N.V. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 3. P. 395. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622030159
  25. Ebrahiminezhad A., Najafipour S., Kouhpayeh A. et al. // Colloids Surf., B: Biointerfaces. 2014. V. 118. P. 249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.03.052
  26. Dubovoy V., Ganti A., Zhang T. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018. V. 140. № 42. P. 13534. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b04843
  27. Bokov D., Turki Jalil A., Chupradit S. et al. // Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5102014
  28. Yamamoto M., Takami T., Matsumura R. et al. // Biocontrol Sci. Jpn. 2016. V. 21. № 4. P. 231. https://doi.org/10.4265/bio.21.231
  29. Frolov N.A., Fedoseeva K.A., Hansford K. et al. // ChemMedChem. 2021. V. 16. № 19. P. 2954. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.202100284
  30. Seferyan M.A., Saverina E.A., Frolov N.A. et al. // ACS Infect. Dis. 2023. V. 9. № 6. P. 1206. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.2c00546
  31. Xu J., Ren D., Chen N. et al. // Colloids Surf., A: Physicochem. 2021. V. 625. P. 126845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126845
  32. Esmaeili H., Mousavi S.M., Hashemi S.A. et al. Chapter 7 – Application of biosurfactants in the removal of oil from emulsion. Elsevier, 2021. P. 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822696-4.00008-5
  33. Azum N., Alotaibi M.M., Ali M. et al. // J. Mol. Liq. 2023. V. 259. P. 121057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.121057

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig.

Download (44KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 1. The scheme of the traditional synthesis of sol-gel matrices with subsequent loading of an antimicrobial drug (a) and synthesis of a drug using an HOUR as a template (b) [20].

Download (416KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Fig. 2. Acid hydrolysis in the absence of cells: a – bar-label 50 microns, b– bar-label 5 microns; c, d – acid hydrolysis in the presence of Ogataea polymorpha cells (bar-label 5 microns), d – alkaline hydrolysis in the absence of cells (bar-label 10 microns), e – alkaline hydrolysis in the presence of Cryptococcus curvatus cells (bar label 5 microns).

Download (697KB)
Indexing metadata
5. Fig. 3. Structures of the compounds studied in the work. Compounds 1a–1g were first described in [26], compound 2 in [27].

Download (49KB)
Indexing metadata
6. Fig. 4. Curves of dependence of MFN on the concentration of a solution of a series of compounds 1 (a), compounds 2 (b).

Download (144KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences