Regularities of the formation of cool-flame oxidation products of rich propane-oxygen mixtures in a two-section reactor

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The effect of the ratio of the reagents on a stabilized cool flame of rich propane-oxygen mixtures is investigated. It was found that with an increase in the initial concentration of propane in the mixture, its consumption, as well as the concentration of propylene, has a maximum a ratio of C3H8 : O2 = 1 : 1. In this case, the selectivity of propylene formation reaches a maximum a ratio of C3H8 : O2 = 4 : 1. It is shown that an increase in the initial propane concentration in the mixture increases the yield of methane, but reduces the yield of propylene, ethylene, hydrogen, CO, CO2, methanol, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde. At a ratio of C3H8 : O2 = 6 : 1, ethane was also found in the reaction products. The possibility of ethanol formation in the reactions of ethoxyl and hydroxyethyl radicals with acetaldehyde has been analyzed using the CBS-QB3 quantum-chemical method.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

N. M. Poghosyan

Nalbandyan Institute of Chemical Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Republic of Armenia

Email: strekova@bk.ru
Armenia, Yerevan

M. Dj. Poghosyan

Nalbandyan Institute of Chemical Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Republic of Armenia

Email: strekova@bk.ru
Armenia, Yerevan

A. H. Davtyan

Nalbandyan Institute of Chemical Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Republic of Armenia

Email: strekova@bk.ru
Armenia, Yerevan

S. D. Arsentev

Nalbandyan Institute of Chemical Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Republic of Armenia

Email: strekova@bk.ru
Armenia, Yerevan

L. N. Strekova

Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: strekova@bk.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

V. S. Arutyunov

Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: strekova@bk.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Poghosyan N.M., Poghosyan M.D., Shapovalova O.V. et al. Technologiacal Combustion / Ed. Aldoshin S.M., Alimov M.I., Arutyunov V.S. et al. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences, 2018. P. 114. https://doi.org/10.31857/S9785907036383000005
  2. Poghosyan N.M., Poghosyan M.D., Strekova L.N. et al. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2015. V. 9(2). P. 218. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793115020104
  3. Poghosyan N.M., Poghosyan M.D., Arsentiev S.D. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2015. V. 9(2). P. 231. https://doi.org/10.1134/S199079311502027X
  4. Grigoryan R.R., Arsentev S.D. // Pet. Chem. 2020. V. 60. № 2. P. 187. https://doi.org/10.1134/S096554412002005X
  5. Pogosyan N.M., Pogosyan M.Dj., Arsentiev S.D. et al. // Petr. Chem. 2020. V. 60. № 3. P. 316. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544120030172
  6. Arsentev S.D., Tavadyan L.A., Bryukov M.G. et al. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2022. V. 16(6). P. 1019. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793122060021
  7. Palankoeva A.S., Belyaev A.A., Arutyunov V.S. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2022. V. 16(3). P. 399. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793122030204
  8. Bryukov M.G., Belyaev A.A., Zakharov A.A. et al. // Kinetics and Catalysis. 2022. V. 63(6). P. 653. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0023158422060039
  9. Shtern V.Ya. Oxidation of Hydrocarbons. Oxford, London, New York: Pergamon Press, 1964.
  10. Prettre M. // Bul. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1932. Ser. 4. V. 41. № 9. P. 1132.
  11. Knox J.H., Norrish R.G.W. // Trans. Far. Soc. 1954. V. 50. № 9. P. 928.
  12. Hughes R., Simmons R.F. // Combust and Flame. 1970. V. 14. № 1. P. 103.
  13. Ouellet L., Leger E., Ouellet C. // J. Chem. Phys. 1950. V. 18. P. 383. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1747636
  14. Unusual “cool flames” discovered aboard International Space Station. https://new.nsf.gov/news/unusual-cool-flames-discovered-aboard
  15. Lin K.C., Chiu Ch.-T. // Fuel. 2017. V. 203. P. 102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.064
  16. Liu J., Yu R., Ma B. // ACS Omega 2020. V. 5. P. 16448.
  17. Titova N.S., Kuleshov P.S., Starik A.M. // Combust. Explosion, Shock Waves. 2011. V. 47. № 3. P. 249. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010508211030014
  18. Poghosyan N.M., Poghosyan M.D., Arsentev S.D. et al. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2023. V. 17. № 5. P. 1130. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X2309008X
  19. Mantashyan A.A. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2021. V. 15. P. 233. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793121020214
  20. Troshin K.Ya., Rubtsov N.M., Tsvetkov G.I. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2022. V. 16(1). P. 39. https://doi.org/10.1134/S199079312201016X
  21. Mantashyan A.A., Gukasyan P.S. // Dokl. Acad. Nauk USSR. 1977. V. 234(2). P. 379.
  22. Mantashyan A.A., Gukasyan P.S., Sayadyan R.H. // React. Kinet. Cat. Lett. 1979. V. 11. P. 225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02067830
  23. Pogosyan M.J., Aliev R.K., Mantashyn A.A. // React. Kinet. Cat. Lett. 1985. V. 27. № 2. P. 437. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02070490
  24. Simonyan T.R., Mantashyan A.A. // React. Kinet. Cat. Lett. 1981. V. 17. № 3–4. P. 319.
  25. Simonyan T.R., Mantashyan A.A. // Arm. Khim. Zhurn. 1979. V. 32(10). P. 757.
  26. Carlier M., Sochet L.-R. // Combust and Flame. 1978. V. 33. № 1–4. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(78)90039-1
  27. Pauwels J.F., Carlier M., Devolder P., Sochet L.-R. // Ibid. 1990. V. 82. № 2. P. 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(90)90095-9
  28. Frisch M.J., Trucks G.W., Schlegel H.B., Scuseria G.E., Robb M.A., Cheeseman, J.R., Scalmani G., Barone V., Petersson G.A., Nakatsuji H., Li X., Caricato M., Marenich A.V., Bloino J., Janesko B.G., Gomperts R., Mennucci B., Hratchian H.P., Ortiz J.V., Izmaylov A.F., Sonnenberg J.L., Williams-Young D., Ding F., Lipparini F., Egidi F., Goings J., Peng B., Petrone A., Henderson T., Ranasinghe D., Zakrzewski V.G., Gao J., Rega N., Zheng G., Liang W., Hada M., Ehara M., Toyota K., Fukuda R., Hasegawa J., Ishida M., Nakajima T., Honda Y., Kitao O., Nakai H., Vreven T., Throssell K., Montgomery J.A. Jr., Peralta J.E., Ogliaro F., Bearpark M.J., Heyd J.J., Brothers E.N., Kudin K.N., Staroverov V.N., Keith T.A., Kobayashi R., Normand J., Raghavachari K., Rendell A.P., Burant J.C., Iyengar S.S., Tomasi J., Cossi M., Millam J.M., Klene M., Adamo C., Cammi R., Ochterski J.W., Martin R.L., Morokuma K., Farkas O., Foresman J.B., Fox D.J. Gaussian 16. Rev. C.01, Wallingford CT: Gaussian, Inc., 2016.
  29. Dennington R., Keith T.A., Millam J.M. GaussView. Ver. 6.1, Shawnee Mission, KS: Semichem Inc., 2019.
  30. Grigoryan R.R., Aresnt’ev S.D., Mantashyan A.A. // Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves. 1981. V. 17(3). P. 272. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00751298
  31. Poladyan E.A., Grigoryan G.L., Khachatryan L.A., Mantashyan A.A. // Kinet. Katal. 1976. V. 17(2). P. 304.
  32. Grigoryan R.R., Arsentev S.D., Mantashyan A.A. // Chemistry and Chemical Technology. 1983. V. 2. P. 15.
  33. Mantashyan A.A. // Chem. Phys. Reports. 1996. V. 15(4). P. 545.
  34. Mantashyan A.A. Khachatryan L.A. Niazyan O.M., Arsentyev S.D. // Combust. and Flame. 1981. V. 43. P. 221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(81)90022-5
  35. Hippler H., Striebel F., Viskolcz B. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2001. V. 3. № 12. P. 2450; https://doi.org/10.1039/B101376I
  36. Xu Z.F., Xu K., Lin M.C. // ChemPhysChem. 2009. V. 10. P. 972. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200800719
  37. Zhang Y., Zhang S.W., Li Q.S. // Chem. Phys. 2004. V. 296. P. 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEMPHYS.2003.09.030
  38. Mantashyan A.A., Arsentev S.D. // Kinetika i kataliz. 1981. V. 22(4). P. 898.
  39. Mantashyan A.A., Arsentev S.D. // Kinetika i kataliz. 1981. V. 22(6). P. 1389.
  40. Morris E.D., Stedman D.H., Niki H. // J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1971. V. 93. № 15. P. 3570.
  41. Meagher J.F., Heicklen J. // J. Phys. Chem. 1976. V. 80. № 15. P. 1645.
  42. Davtyan A.H., Manukyan Z.H., Arsentev S.D. et al. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2023. V. 17(2). P. 336. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793123020239
  43. Williams A.E., Hammer N.I., Tschumper G.S. // J. Chem. Phys. 2021. V. 155. № 114306. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0062809

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Effect of the propane/oxygen ratio in the initial mixture on the selectivity S for the formation of methane (1), ethylene (2) and hydrogen (3) during propane oxidation in the stabilized cold flame mode; T = 350 °C, P = 340 Torr, τ = 18.2 s.

Download (59KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. Dependence of the partial pressure P of oxygen-containing products of propane oxidation at the reactor outlet in the stabilized cold flame mode on the propane/oxygen ratio in the initial mixture: 1 – CO, 2 – CH3OH, 3 – CH2O, 4 – CO2, 5 – CH3CHO; T = 350 °C, P = 340 Torr, τ = 18.2 s.

Download (69KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Fig. 3. Dependence of propane consumption ∆[C3H8] (1), partial pressure of propylene (2) and selectivity of its formation (3) on the propane/oxygen ratio in the initial mixture; T = 350 °C, P = 340 Torr, τ = 18.2 s.

Download (71KB)
Indexing metadata
5. Fig. 4. Dependences of the selectivity of formation of methanol (1), formaldehyde (2) and acetaldehyde (3) on the propane/oxygen ratio in the initial mixture; T = 350 °C, P = 340 Torr, τ = 18.2 s.

Download (55KB)
Indexing metadata
6. Fig. 5. Structures of the ethoxyl radical (a), the transition state (b) of the reaction C2H5O● ↔ ●C2H4OH and the hydroxyethyl radical (c), calculated by the CBS-QB3 quantum chemical method.

Download (56KB)
Indexing metadata
7. Fig. 6. Total energy diagram (∆E) for the system describing the interaction of ethoxyl and hydroxyethyl radicals with acetaldehyde. The reaction system was calculated by the CBS-QB3 method. The energies are shown relative to C2H5OH + CH3CO●, CR1–[C2H5O–CH3CHO], CP1–[C2H5OH–CH3CO]_1, CR2–[C2H4OH-CH3CHO], CP2–[C2H5OH–CH3CO]_2, CP3–[CH3CHOH–CH3CHO] – pre- and postreaction complex states corresponding to the reactants and products of reactions (3), (3a), and (3b).

Download (149KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences