Effect of fermentation by lactobacilli on the functional — technological properties of pea protein isolates

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

The effect of fermentation with three bacterial preparations: BK-Uglich-K, BK-Uglich-AB and BK-Uglich-P (Russia) on solubility, emulsifying activity, emulsion stability, foaming and foam stability of isolates preparated from two varieties of peas was studied. It has been shown that fermentation with bacterial cultures can increase the solubility of isolates at pH 3 by 4 to 17.5 times, at pH 4 — more than 3 times, at pH 5 — by 23% to 80%, at pH 6 — by 27% to 43%, at pH 7 — by 18% to 27%. Fermentation increased the index of emulsifying activity of isolates at pH 5 by 37% (in one of the varieties), the stability index of the emulsion at pH 3 by 19% to 28%, at pH 4 — by 17%, at pH 5 — by 18% (in one of the varieties), at pH 6 — by 16% to 35%. Fermentation increased the foaming of isolates at pH 3 by 2.2 times, at pH 4 by 1.4 to 2.4 times, at pH 5 and 6 by 1.8 to 4 times, at pH 7 by 2.1 to 2.4 times; at the same time, the stability of the foam of isolates at pH 4 increased by 11% to 22%, at pH 5 — by 11% to 13%, at pH 6 — by 15% (in one of the varieties), at pH 7 — 28% (in one of the varieties). The results obtained made it possible to select bacterial preparations to improve the parameters of pea protein isolates intended for the manufacture of various food products: pea cola (BK-Uglich-P), analogues of fermented milk products and analogues of milk (BK-Uglich-AB).

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

I. Kravchenko

Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: ink71@yandex.ru
Rússia, Moscow, 119071

V. Furalyov

Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ink71@yandex.ru
Rússia, Moscow, 119071

E. Pshennikova

Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ink71@yandex.ru
Rússia, Moscow, 119071

A. Fedorov

Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ink71@yandex.ru
Rússia, Moscow, 119071

V. Popov

Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ink71@yandex.ru
Rússia, Moscow, 119071

Bibliografia

  1. Meinlschmidt P., Ueberham E., Lehmann J., Schweiggert-Weisz U., Eisner P. // Food Chem. 2016. V. 205. P. 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.03.016
  2. Schlegel K., Leidigkeit A., Eisner P., Schweiggert-Weisz U. // Foods. 2019. V. 8. Р. 678. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8120678
  3. Lampart-Szczapa E., Konieczny P., Nogala-Kałucka M., Walczak S., Kossowska I., Malinowska M. // Food Chem. 2006. V. 96. P. 290–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.02.0315
  4. Liu Y., Zhu S., Li Y., Sun F., Huang D., Chen X. // Food Res. Int. 2023. V. 165. Р. 112453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.112453
  5. Schlegel K., Lidzba N., Ueberham E., Eisner P., Schweiggert-Weisz U. //Foods. 2021. V. 10. № 2. Р. 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020281
  6. Biscola V., de Olmos A. R., Choiset Y., Rabesona H., Garro M. S., Mozzi F., et al. // Beneficial Microbes. 2017. V. 8. № 4. P. 635–643. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2016.0171
  7. El Mecherfi K.-E., Lupi R., Cherkaoui M., Albuquerque M. A., Todorov S. D., Tranquet O. et al. // Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins. 2022. V. 14. № 5. P. 779-791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-021-09808-1
  8. Lu Q., Zuo L., Wu Z., Li X., Tong P., Wu Y. et al. // Food Chemistry. 2022. V. 366 Р.130569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130569
  9. Nordström E.A., Teixeira C., Montelius C., Jeppsson B., Larsson N. // Benef. Microbes. 2021. V. 12. № 5. P. 441–465. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2020.019
  10. Muñoz R., Rivas B.L., Rodríguez H., Esteban-Torres M., Reverón I. et al. // Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2024. V. 412. P. 110555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2023.110555
  11. García Arteaga V., Leffler S., Muranyi I., Eisner P., Schweiggert-Weisz U. // Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2020. V. 4. P. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2020.12.001
  12. Vazquez-Munoz R., Dongari-Bagtzoglou A. // Front Oral Health. 2021. V. 2. P. 689382. https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2021.689382
  13. Функ И.А., Иркитова А.Н. // Acta Biologiсa Sibirica. 2015. Т.1 . №1–2. С. 85–93. https://doi.org/10.14258/abs.v1i1-2.844
  14. Стоянова Л.Г., Дбар С.Д., Полянская И.С. // Биотехнология. 2022. Т. 38. № 1. С. 3–12. https://doi.org/10.56304/S0234275822010070
  15. Illikoud N., do Carmo F.L.R., Daniel N., Jan G., Gagnaire V. // Food Res Int. 2023. V. 166. P. 112557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112557
  16. Higgins T.J., Chandler P.M., Randall P.J., Spencer D., Beach L.R., Blagrove R.J. et al. // J. Biol. Chem. 1986. V. 261. P. 11124–11130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)67357-0
  17. Stone A.K., Karalash A., Tyler R.T., Warkentin T.D., Nickerson N.T. // Food Research International. 2015. V. 76. P. 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.11.017
  18. Asen N.D., Aluko R.E. // Front Nutr. 2022. V. 9. P. 852225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.852225
  19. Ivanova P., Kalaydzhiev H., Dessev T.T., Silva C.L.M., Rustad T., Chalova V.I.J. // Food Sci. Technol. 2018. V. 55. № 9. P. 3792–3798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3311-y
  20. Kravchenko I.V., Furalyov V.A., Kostyleva E.V., Sereda A.S., Kurbatova E.I., Tsurikova N.V. et al. // Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2024. V. 60. № 1. P. 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683824010083

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar
2. Fig. 1. The effect of fermentation on the solubility of pea protein isolates of the Fokor (a) and Batrak (b) varieties at different pH values: 1 - without fermentation, 2 - fermentation of BK-Uglich-K, 3 - fermentation of BK-Uglich-P, 4 - fermentation of BK-Uglich-AV.

Baixar (158KB)
Metadados
3. Fig. 2. Effect of pea protein fermentation on the emulsifying activity index of pea protein isolates of the Fokor (a) and Batrak (b) varieties at different pH values. 1 — without fermentation, 2 — fermentation of pea protein BK-Uglich-K, 3 — fermentation of pea protein BK-Uglich-P, 4 — fermentation of pea protein BK-Uglich-AV.

Baixar (263KB)
Metadados
4. Fig. 3. Effect of fermentation on the emulsion stability index of pea protein isolates of the Fokor (a) and Batrak (b) varieties at different pH values. 1 - without fermentation, 2 - fermentation of BK-Uglich-K, 3 - fermentation of BK-Uglich-P, 4 - fermentation of BK-Uglich-AV.

Baixar (254KB)
Metadados
5. Fig. 4. Effect of fermentation on foaming of pea protein isolates of the Fokor (a) and Batrak (b) varieties at different pH values. 1 — without fermentation, 2 — fermentation of BK-Uglich-K, 3 — fermentation of BK-Uglich-P, 4 — fermentation of BK-Uglich-AV.

Baixar (212KB)
Metadados
6. Fig. 5. Effect of BK fermentation on the foam stability of pea protein isolates of the Fokor (a) and Batrak (b) varieties after 30 and 60 min at different pH values. 1 - without fermentation, 2 - BK-Uglich-K fermentation, 3 - BK-Uglich-P fermentation, 4 - BK-Uglich-AV fermentation.

Baixar (402KB)
Metadados

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025