Speech perception and communicative-speech characteristics of hearing-impaired children with late hearing aid fitting

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Late identification of hearing impairments in children has significant negative effect on child development, with speech and communication skills to be the most severely affected. research data indicate considerable variability in speech and communication outcomes among late-identified hearing impaired children. The aim of the current study was to examine the audiological indicators in late-identified hearing-impaired children and their correlations with the level of speech and communication development. 23 children aged 5 to 8 years with bilateral permanent sensorineural hearing loss of moderate to severe degree participated in the study. All children were fitted with binaural hearing aids after the age of 2.5 years (average age of first hearing aids fitting was 4.5 years). Hearing examination including speech audiometry and the assessment of the level of speech development and communication skills were utilized. results revealed a significant decline in performance among hearing-impaired children in all speech tests, both in quiet and noisy environments, when compared with normative data. A considerable delay in the level of speech and communicative development of hearing-impaired children compared with the normative data was revealed. The results indicate that late hearing aid fitting may cause secondary impairments of auditory function, including central auditory processing disorders, which may develop against the background of prolonged auditory deprivation. The importance of the early intervention programs and the implementation of the prompt hearing screening for young and preschool children to identify delayed hearing loss is emphasized.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

E. S. Garbaruk

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: kgrbaruk@mail.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg; St. Petersburg

M. Y. Boboshko

Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University; Saint Petersburg State University

Email: kgrbaruk@mail.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg; St. Petersburg

Y. S. Kibalova

Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University

Email: kgrbaruk@mail.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

D. I. Chernego

Saint Petersburg State University

Email: kgrbaruk@mail.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

A. A. Kozyreva

Saint Petersburg State University

Email: kgrbaruk@mail.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

O. P. Pavlova

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: kgrbaruk@mail.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

V. M. Knyazeva

Saint Petersburg State University

Email: kgrbaruk@mail.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

M. J. Vasilyeva

Saint Petersburg State University

Email: kgrbaruk@mail.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

References

  1. Tavartkiladze G.A. [Clinical Audiology]: National Guidelines. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2024. 328 p.
  2. Chadha Dr.Sh. [Global action for hearing loss] // Vestn. Otorinolaringol. 2018. V. 83. № 4. P. 5.
  3. Joint committee on infant hearing. Year 2019 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs // J. Early Hear. Detect. Interv. 2019. V. 4. № 2. P. 1.
  4. Garbaruk E.S., Fedorova L.A., Savenko I.V. et al. [Childhood hearing screening: Achievements, difficulties, and possible ways to improve] // Vestn. Otorinolaringol. 2021. V. 86. № 1. P. 82.
  5. Borg E., Quist G, Reinholdson A.C. et al. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing impaired pre-school // Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2007. V. 71. № 7. P. 1061.
  6. Moeller M.P., Tomblin J.B., Yoshinaga-Itano C. et al. Current state of knowledge: Language and literacy of children with hearing impairment // Ear Hear. 2007. V. 28. № 6. P. 740.
  7. Mcleods C.K. A systematic review of cross-linguistic and metalinguistic speech and language out comes for children with hearing loss // Int. J. Biling Edu. 2014. V. 17. № 3. P. 287.
  8. Zussino J., Zupan B., Preston R. Speech, language, and literacy outcomes for children with mild to moderate hearing loss: A systematic review // J. Commun. Disord. 2022. V. 99. P. 106248.
  9. Nassrallah F., Tang K., Whittingham J. et al. Auditory, social, and behavioral skills of children with unilateral/mild hearing loss // J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 2020. V. 25. № 2. P. 167.
  10. Moeller M.P., Mccleary T., Stelmachowicz P. et al. Longitudinal development of phonology and morphology children with late-identified mild–moderate sensorineural hearing loss // Ear Hear. 2010. V. 31. № 5. P. 625.
  11. Tuller L., Delage H. Mild-to-moderate hearing loss and language impairment: How are they linked? // Lingua. 2014. V. 139. P. 80.
  12. Bezrukikh M.M. [Left-handed child: Notebook for classes with children. Methodological recom-mendations]. Moscow: Ventana-Graf, 2001. 64 p.
  13. Garbaruk E.S., Gorkina O.K., Pavlov P.V., Boboshko M.Y. [Speech intelligibility in a free sound field in normally hearing children aged 5–17 years] // Vestn. Otorinolaringol. 2025. V. 90. № 1. P. 5.
  14. Boboshko M.Yu., Savenko I.V., Garbaruk E.S. et al. [Practical audiology]. SPb.: Dialog, 2021. 420 p.
  15. Boboshko M.Yu., Riekhakainen E.I. [Speech audiometry in clinical practice]. SPb.: Dialog, 2019. 82 p.
  16. Newborg J., Stock J.r., Wnek L. Battelle developmental inventory with recalibrated data and norms. The riverside Publishing Company, 1984. 45 p.
  17. Vasilyeva M.J. Developmental status of preterm infants // Int. J. Psychol. 2008. V. 43. № 3–4. P. 701.
  18. Vasilyeva M.J., Batuev A.S., Vershinina E.A. [Features of development of premature infants in the first year of life] // Psychol. J. 2009. V. 30. № 3. P. 52.
  19. Mukhamedrakhimov R.Zh., Nikiforova N.V., Pal-mov O.I. et al. The influence of changes in early social-emotional experience on the development of institutionalized children / Translated from English under scientific editorship of Mukhamedrakhimov R.Zh. M.: National Foundation for the Protection of Children from Cruelty, 2009. 296 p.
  20. Chernego D.I., McCall R.B., Wanless S.B. et al. The effect of a social-emotional intervention on the development of preterm infants in institutions // Infants Young Child. 2018. V. 31. № 1. P. 37.
  21. Musiek F.E. Auditory neuroscience and diagnosis / Handbook of central auditory processing disorder // Eds. Musiek F.E., Chermak G.D. 2nd ed V. 1. San Diego: Plural Publishing, 2014. 745 p.
  22. Koroleva I.V. [Basis of Audiology and Hearing Aid Fitting]. SPb.: KARO, 2017. 317 p.
  23. Warzybok A., Zhilinskaya E., Goykhburg M. et al. Clinical validation of the russian Matrix test – effect of hearing loss, age, and noise level // Int. J. Audiol. 2020. V. 59. № 12. P. 930.
  24. Puglisi G. E., di Berardino F., Montuschi C. et al. Evaluation of Italian Simplified Matrix Test for Speech-recognition Measurements in Noise // Audiol Res. 2021. V. 11. № 1. P. 73.
  25. Wake M., Hughes E.K., Poulakis Z. et al. Outcomes of children with mild-profound congenital hearing loss at 7 to 8 years: A population study // Ear Hear. 2004. V. 25. № 1. P. 1.
  26. Delage H., Tuller L. Language development and mildto-mode rate hearing loss: Does language normalize with age? // J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2007. V. 50. № 5. P. 1300.
  27. Yoshinaga-Itano C., Sedey A.L., Coulter D.K., Mehl A.L. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss // Pediatrics. 1998. V. 102. № 5. P. 1161.
  28. Halliday L.F., Tuomainen O., Rosen S. Language Development and Impairment in Children With Mild to Moderate Sensorineural Hearing Loss // J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2017. V. 60. № 6. P. 1551.
  29. Tomblin J.B., Harrison M., Ambrose S.E. et al. Language outcomes in young children with mild to severe hearing loss // Ear Hear.2015. V. 36. Suppl. 1. P. 76S.
  30. Markova T.G., Bliznetz E.A., Poliakov A.V., Tavartkiladze G.A. [Twenty years of clinical studies of GJB2-linked hearing loss in russia] // Vestn. Otorinolaringol. 2018. V. 83. № 4. P. 31.
  31. Tufatulin G.S., Koroleva I.V. [Cross-Sectional Study of Hearing Status in Primary Students in Mainstream and Special Schools] // Russ. Pediatr. J. 2022. V. 3. № 3. P. 441.
  32. Pashkov A.V., Naumova I.V., Namazova-Baranova L.S. et al. [Pure-tone audiometry using portable screening system in groups of students] // Russian Otorhinolaryngology. 2020. V. 19. P. 50.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Intelligibility of monosyllabic and polysyllabic words in silence (A) and noise (B). Gray color – results of hearing-impaired children; white color – normative data [13].

Download (853KB)
3. Fig. 2. Intelligibility of phrasal speech (simplified RuMatrix test) in silence (A) and noise (B). See Fig. 1 for other symbols.

Download (693KB)
4. Fig. 3. Intelligibility of monosyllabic and polysyllabic words in silence (A) and noise (B). White color – results of subgroup 1 (degree II hearing loss), light gray – subgroup 2 (degrees III–IV hearing loss).

Download (611KB)
5. Fig. 4. Intelligibility of phrasal speech (RuMatrix test) in silence (A) and noise (B). * – p ˂ 0.005, ** – p < 0.001. For other symbols, see Fig. 3.

Download (556KB)
6. Fig. 5. Comparative indicators of delays in speech and communication development in two subgroups of hearing-impaired children. IR – receptive speech; ER – expressive speech; RR – speech development; KS – communication skills; white – results of subgroup 1 (degree II hearing loss), light gray – subgroup 2 (degree III–IV hearing loss).

Download (929KB)

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences