Two tactics to combat bourgeois historiography: S.A. Piontkovsky and N.L. Rubinshtein
- 作者: Slepenko I.1
- 
							隶属关系: 
							- Institute of Russian History, Russian Academy of Sciences
 
- 期: 编号 2 (2025)
- 页面: 187-193
- 栏目: Profession and community
- URL: https://cardiosomatics.ru/2949-124X/article/view/685999
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2949124X25020252
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EDRELW
- ID: 685999
如何引用文章
详细
The article considers strategies of interaction of historians with ideological processes, that occurred in Soviet historical science in the early 1930s. It compares the approaches of S.A. Piontkovsky and N.L. Rubinshtein. Piontkovsky is known for his tactic of active participating in these processes, while Rubinshtein follows a passive approach that involves maximizing the use of authoritative quotes.
全文:
 
												
	                        作者简介
Ilya Slepenko
Institute of Russian History, Russian Academy of Sciences
							编辑信件的主要联系方式.
							Email: otech_ist@mail.ru
				                					                																			                								
graduate student				                	俄罗斯联邦, 							Moscow						
									参考
补充文件
 
				
			 
						 
						 
						 
						 
					

 
  
  
  电邮这篇文章
			电邮这篇文章 
 开放存取
		                                开放存取 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
						##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##